Election Observation: As Liberia Decides, Are There Lessons From Kenya?

share on:
Election Observation: As Liberia Decides, Are There Lessons From Kenya?, By Samson Itodo

Election Observation: As Liberia Decides, Are There Lessons From Kenya?, By Samson Itodo

CLICK here to read more opinion articles

Skeptics of election observation received a boost with the Kenya Supreme Court’s nullification of the August 8th, 2017 presidential elections. The court ruled that the election was not conducted in accordance with established procedures by the election management body, hence the directive that the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) conducts a fresh election into the office of the president. The botched election had been adjudged credible by several election observation missions.

This piece was written by Samson Itodo. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of 360Nobs.com.

The entire world then went agog calling for the scraping of election observation. International observation missions were the worst hit as they were termed as electoral tourists. They were accused of subverting the will of the people in the pursuance of peace. The Carter Centre, National Democratic Institute (NDI), European Union Observation Mission received the most bashing. The argument has been that international observation missions are only valuable to the extent that they provide oversight on the conduct of elections. This resonates with the view that their presence could potentially deter electoral fraud.

Across Africa, citizens and stakeholders have confidence in the findings of election observers because they not only validate the electoral outcomes but also proffer recommendations for future reforms. In fact, in countries like Uganda, Cameroon and Zimbabwe, citizens repose more confidence in the reports of election observation missions than their electoral management body. Thus, the surprise generated with the quashing of the Kenyan presidential election, which was validated by most of the EOMs. However, this development beckons for a deep introspection, not jettisoning of election observation, since it reposes confidence in the electoral process. Again, there’s a reliance on the findings of election observer missions in assessing the level of democracy in sovereign states. This, to an extent, influences international democracy assistance to countries.

The end of the cold war ushered the third wave of democratisation which introduced international election observation as an event or mechanism for promoting universal and democratic standards in sovereign states, particularly in emerging democracies or in transiting democracies. Since then, election observation has evolved with respect to scope and methodology, and same with the standards of assessing elections. This advancement led to the codification of standards for election observation into international or regional instruments. The Declaration of Global Principles for Nonpartisan Election Observation and Monitoring by Citizen Organisations is one of such instruments that outlines conditions or standards for credible and professional election observation. These following conditions are vital to the credibility and sustainability of election observation missions:

1. The independence and integrity of the election observation mission must be guaranteed. The mission must have high regard for standards and professional ethics;
2. Neutrality, quality and objectivity in data gathering, analysis and reporting;
3. The scope and methodology must be comprehensive, spanning all aspects of the elections because election is a process and not an event;
4. Respect and compliance with established municipal or international legal and regulatory frameworks.

It is important to reconsider the composition of EOMs. Traditionally, EOMs are composed of diverse membership of past leaders, politicians, academics, civil society, media etc. Some of these personages are politically exposed persons whose personality may impugn the integrity of the mission. Regional institutions and international organisations should be weary of persons recruited and employed to serve as election observers. EOMs must prioritise the moral and integrity credentials of these individuals because their moral stands or public a perception could undermine the integrity of the observer mission, making it easy for their findings to be discredited.

International EOMs must also strengthen their collaboration with the domestic election observer groups. The domestic groups often deploy more observers hence the need for complementarity in their role. IOMs are at their best when they amplify issues raised by local observer groups during elections.

It’s a notorious fact that the results collation process is the weakest link in most elections in Africa. This aspect of the electoral process has received little or no attention from observers. The present situation is for the group to mention it in passing but there has been no deliberate effort to methodically oversight the results collation process. It is important for observer missions to dedicate quality time to the observation of the results collation process. Specific observers should be deployed to observe results collation. This can be made possible with strong partnership with local and citizens observers.

It has also become imperative for EOMs to review their timeline of issuing statements and reports, lest it is misconstrued as providing a verdict on an election. Perhaps there’s need for an expanded definition of the usual line, “the election was free and fair based on our observation”. Electoral integrity and political stability are both important for the sustenance of democracy.

It is important that these issues are reviewed and lessons learnt ahead of the October 10th Liberia Election. Already there is a beehive of activities in Liberia. The Robert International Airport is in full buzz with planes arriving and ferrying international observers into town, with all the posh hotels fully booked, as the election observers have all moved into the capital city of Monrovia.

Samson Itodo is an elections and constitution building enthusiast. He is the Executive Director of the Youth Initiative for Advocacy, Growth & Advancement (YIAGA). He writes from Liberia where is he serving as an international observer with the Electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy in Africa (EISA) observer mission to Liberia.

This piece was written by Samson Itodo. The views and opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of 360Nobs.com.

Datboyjerry

Datboyjerry

I am but your herald boy in the art of the pen.. An eccentric Environmental Biologist smouldered in the glorious epiphany of online journalism.

If you ever find my article unduly insipid, sue me and i’ll refund you…

Leave a Reply